2006 Toyota Sequoia vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport

To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Toyota Sequoia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Toyota Sequoia would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Sequoia (273 HP) has 164 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.

Because 2006 Toyota Sequoia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Sequoia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Toyota Sequoia 2010 Ford Ecosport
Make Toyota Ford
Model Sequoia Ecosport
Year Released 2006 2010
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4671 cc 1600 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 273 HP 109 HP
Drive Type 4WD Front
Number of Seats 8 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 5190 mm 4228 mm
Vehicle Width 2010 mm 1980 mm
Vehicle Height 1880 mm 1679 mm
Wheelbase Size 3010 mm 2490 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]