2006 Volkswagen Caddy vs. 1984 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2006 Volkswagen Caddy. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2006 Volkswagen Caddy.
Because 1984 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Volkswagen Caddy. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1984 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 2006 Volkswagen Caddy has manual transmission. 2006 Volkswagen Caddy will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1984 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Volkswagen Caddy | 1984 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Volkswagen | Ford |
Model | Caddy | Ranger |
Year Released | 2006 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4690 mm |