2006 Volkswagen Citi vs. 1979 Volvo 66
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Citi is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,423 cc, 2006 Volkswagen Citi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volkswagen Citi (72 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Citi should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 66.
Because 1979 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Citi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volkswagen Citi (108 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Volkswagen Citi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Volkswagen Citi | 1979 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Volvo |
| Model | Citi | 66 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1423 cc | 1289 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 108 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1550 mm |
