2006 Volkswagen Citi vs. 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Citi is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer would be higher. At 4,157 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (269 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 2006 Volkswagen Citi. (72 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 2006 Volkswagen Citi.
Because 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Volkswagen Citi. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (374 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 266 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volkswagen Citi. (108 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volkswagen Citi.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Volkswagen Citi | 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | Volkswagen | Chevrolet |
Model | Citi | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1423 cc | 4157 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 108 Nm | 374 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 71 L |