2006 Volkswagen Citi vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Volkswagen Citi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Volkswagen Citi would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 81 more horse power than 2006 Volkswagen Citi. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2006 Volkswagen Citi.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volkswagen Citi. (108 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volkswagen Citi.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Volkswagen Citi | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Volkswagen | Holden |
Model | Citi | Epica |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1423 cc | 2492 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 108 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |