2006 Volkswagen Lupo vs. 1962 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Lupo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 1,493 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Volkswagen 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volkswagen Lupo (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1962 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Lupo should accelerate faster than 1962 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Volkswagen 1500 weights approximately 30 kg more than 2006 Volkswagen Lupo.
Because 1962 Volkswagen 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Volkswagen 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Lupo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Volkswagen Lupo | 1962 Volkswagen 1500 | |
Make | Volkswagen | Volkswagen |
Model | Lupo | 1500 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1191 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 40 L |