2006 Volkswagen Polo vs. 1979 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,422 cc (3 cylinders), 2006 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volkswagen Polo (79 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1979 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1979 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 307 kg more than 1979 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Volkswagen Polo | 1979 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Volkswagen | Zastava |
Model | Polo | 850 K |
Year Released | 2006 | 1979 |
Engine Size | 1422 cc | 848 cc |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1162 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2010 mm |