2006 Volkswagen Sharan vs. 2009 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2009 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Volkswagen Sharan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Volkswagen Sharan would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 SsangYong Chairman W is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 SsangYong Chairman W (302 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 2006 Volkswagen Sharan. (113 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 SsangYong Chairman W should accelerate faster than 2006 Volkswagen Sharan.
Because 2009 SsangYong Chairman W is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 SsangYong Chairman W. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Sharan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Volkswagen Sharan | 2009 SsangYong Chairman W | |
Make | Volkswagen | SsangYong |
Model | Sharan | Chairman W |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 4966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 177 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |