2006 Volvo S40 vs. 1964 Volvo 120
To start off, 2006 Volvo S40 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo S40 (123 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 120.
Because 1964 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo S40 (165 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 120. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2006 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Volvo S40 | 1964 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Volvo | Volvo |
Model | S40 | 120 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 165 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 45 L |