2006 Volvo S60 vs. 1982 Simca 2 Litres
To start off, 2006 Volvo S60 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Simca 2 Litres. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Simca 2 Litres would be higher. At 1,984 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo S60 weights approximately 408 kg more than 1982 Simca 2 Litres.
Because 1982 Simca 2 Litres is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Simca 2 Litres. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Simca 2 Litres has automatic transmission and 2006 Volvo S60 has manual transmission. 2006 Volvo S60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Simca 2 Litres will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Volvo S60 | 1982 Simca 2 Litres | |
Make | Volvo | Simca |
Model | S60 | 2 Litres |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1981 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1533 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2670 mm |