2006 Volvo XC90 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2006 Volvo XC90 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo XC90 (235 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1212 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo XC90 (321 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Volvo XC90 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Volvo | Zastava |
| Model | XC90 | 102 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 3192 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 235 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 321 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1982 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2160 mm |
