2006 Volvo XC90 vs. 1984 Zastava 750

To start off, 2006 Volvo XC90 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 4,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo XC90 (312 HP @ 5850 RPM) has 279 more horse power than 1984 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1984 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1548 kg more than 1984 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2006 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Zastava 750. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo XC90 (441 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 386 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Zastava 750. 2006 Volvo XC90 has automatic transmission and 1984 Zastava 750 has manual transmission. 1984 Zastava 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Volvo XC90 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: