2006 Volvo XC90 vs. 2011 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2011 Nissan Juke is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Volvo XC90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Volvo XC90 would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Juke (188 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2006 Volvo XC90. (182 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Juke should accelerate faster than 2006 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 838 kg more than 2011 Nissan Juke.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo XC90 (400 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Juke. (240 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Juke.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Volvo XC90 | 2011 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Volvo | Nissan |
Model | XC90 | Juke |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2401 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 188 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1342 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |