2007 Acura MDX vs. 2005 Chrysler Pacifica
To start off, 2007 Acura MDX is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler Pacifica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler Pacifica would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Pacifica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Acura MDX (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler Pacifica. (250 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Acura MDX should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler Pacifica.
Because 2007 Acura MDX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Chrysler Pacifica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Acura MDX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Acura MDX (373 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler Pacifica. (332 Nm). This means 2007 Acura MDX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler Pacifica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Acura MDX | 2005 Chrysler Pacifica | |
| Make | Acura | Chrysler |
| Model | MDX | Pacifica |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2005 |
| Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3664 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 250 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 332 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.5 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 87 L |
