2007 Acura RDX vs. 1980 Volvo 265
To start off, 2007 Acura RDX is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 2,849 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Acura RDX (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 265. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Acura RDX should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 265.
Because 2007 Acura RDX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Volvo 265. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Acura RDX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Acura RDX (353 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 265. (230 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Acura RDX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 265.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Acura RDX | 1980 Volvo 265 | |
Make | Acura | Volvo |
Model | RDX | 265 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2849 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2660 mm |