2007 Acura RDX vs. 2002 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2007 Acura RDX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (301 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2007 Acura RDX. (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2007 Acura RDX.
Because 2007 Acura RDX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Acura RDX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Acura RDX. (353 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Acura RDX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Acura RDX | 2002 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Acura | Jaguar |
| Model | RDX | XJ |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 353 Nm | 541 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3040 mm |
