2007 Acura RDX vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Acura RDX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Acura RDX would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2007 Acura RDX. (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2007 Acura RDX.
Because 2007 Acura RDX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Lotus Evora. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Acura RDX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Acura RDX (353 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Lotus Evora. (350 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2007 Acura RDX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Lotus Evora.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Acura RDX | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Acura | Lotus |
| Model | RDX | Evora |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 353 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.4 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 83 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2047 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1229 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2575 mm |
