2007 Acura RDX vs. 2013 Volvo X670
To start off, 2013 Volvo X670 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Acura RDX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Acura RDX would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo X670 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Acura RDX (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2013 Volvo X670. (237 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Acura RDX should accelerate faster than 2013 Volvo X670.
Because 2007 Acura RDX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Volvo X670. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Acura RDX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Acura RDX (353 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo X670. (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2007 Acura RDX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo X670.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Acura RDX | 2013 Volvo X670 | |
Make | Acura | Volvo |
Model | RDX | X670 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.4 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4838 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1604 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2815 mm |