2007 Acura RL vs. 2000 Ford TS-50
To start off, 2007 Acura RL is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Acura RL (290 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Acura RL weights approximately 367 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2007 Acura RL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford TS-50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Acura RL (347 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2007 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Acura RL | 2000 Ford TS-50 | |
| Make | Acura | Ford |
| Model | RL | TS-50 |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3471 cc | 1989 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 347 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 132 L |
