2007 Acura TL vs. 1963 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2007 Acura TL is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Acura TL (286 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1963 Lincoln Continental. (284 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1963 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1000 kg more than 2007 Acura TL.
Because 1963 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Acura TL | 1963 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Acura | Lincoln |
Model | TL | Continental |
Year Released | 2007 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3471 cc | 7048 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 286 HP | 284 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 2400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3210 mm |