2007 Acura TL vs. 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 2007 Acura TL is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 370 kg more than 2007 Acura TL.
Because 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Acura TL | 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Acura | Oldsmobile |
| Model | TL | Starfire |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3201 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 258 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5370 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3130 mm |
