2007 Acura TL vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 2007 Acura TL is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Acura TL (258 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2007 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1986 Caterham 1700 has manual transmission. 1986 Caterham 1700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Acura TL | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
Make | Acura | Caterham |
Model | TL | 1700 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 1692 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 258 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 36 L |