2007 Alpina B3 vs. 2002 Ford F-250
To start off, 2007 Alpina B3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford F-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford F-250 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Alpina B3 (360 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 2002 Ford F-250. (256 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Alpina B3 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford F-250.
Because 2002 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Alpina B3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Alpina B3 (501 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford F-250. (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2007 Alpina B3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford F-250.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Alpina B3 | 2002 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Alpina | Ford |
Model | B3 | F-250 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 5407 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 360 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 501 Nm | 474 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3490 mm |