2007 Audi A3 vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2007 Audi A3 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,967 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Audi A3 (138 HP) has 98 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Audi A3 weights approximately 295 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2007 Audi A3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Toyota Master RR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Audi A3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Audi A3 | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | A3 | Master RR |
Year Released | 2007 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1967 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 40 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1505 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 75 L |