2007 Audi A6 vs. 2003 Chevrolet Tracker

To start off, 2007 Audi A6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,698 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Audi A6 (178 HP @ 3300 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.

Because 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Audi A6 (380 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Audi A6 2003 Chevrolet Tracker
Make Audi Chevrolet
Model A6 Tracker
Year Released 2007 2003
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2698 cc 1590 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 178 HP 97 HP
Engine RPM 3300 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 380 Nm 139 Nm
Torque RPM 1400 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4920 mm 3860 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase Size 2850 mm 2210 mm