2007 Audi TT vs. 1968 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2007 Audi TT is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Audi TT (221 HP @ 2200 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Audi TT weights approximately 260 kg more than 1968 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Audi TT (280 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2007 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Audi TT | 1968 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | TT | Cedric |
Year Released | 2007 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 2200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2700 mm |