2007 Audi TT vs. 2010 Suzuki Equator

To start off, 2010 Suzuki Equator is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Audi TT would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Suzuki Equator (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2007 Audi TT. (221 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 2007 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Audi TT weights approximately 100 kg more than 2010 Suzuki Equator.

Because 2007 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Suzuki Equator. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Suzuki Equator (381 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Audi TT. (280 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2010 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Audi TT. 2010 Suzuki Equator has automatic transmission and 2007 Audi TT has manual transmission. 2007 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Suzuki Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Audi TT 2010 Suzuki Equator
Make Audi Suzuki
Model TT Equator
Year Released 2007 2010
Body Type Coupe Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1781 cc 3954 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 5 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 221 HP 261 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 280 Nm 381 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 9.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1395 kg 1295 kg
Vehicle Length 4050 mm 5250 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1790 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 3200 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.4 L/100km 7.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 62 L 80 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]