2007 Bentley Continental Flying Spur vs. 2004 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2007 Bentley Continental Flying Spur is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 5,996 cc, 2007 Bentley Continental Flying Spur is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Bentley Continental Flying Spur (551 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 341 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (210 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Bentley Continental Flying Spur should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Bentley Continental Flying Spur weights approximately 834 kg more than 2004 Dodge Dakota. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Bentley Continental Flying Spur (650 Nm) has 331 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (319 Nm). This means 2007 Bentley Continental Flying Spur will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Bentley Continental Flying Spur | 2004 Dodge Dakota | |
| Make | Bentley | Dodge |
| Model | Continental Flying Spur | Dakota |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5996 cc | 3687 cc |
| Engine Type | W | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 551 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 650 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2475 kg | 1641 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5310 mm | 5470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2120 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 3330 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 17.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 76 L |
