2007 BMW 118 vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2007 BMW 118 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 BMW 118 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 BMW 118 (127 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 BMW 118 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 115 kg more than 2007 BMW 118.
Because 2007 BMW 118 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 BMW 118. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (240 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 BMW 118. (180 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 BMW 118.
Compare all specifications:
2007 BMW 118 | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 118 | 6 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 208 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.2 seconds | 11 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |