2007 BMW 320 vs. 2000 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2007 BMW 320 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 BMW 320 (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2000 Ford Ranger. (135 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 BMW 320 weights approximately 97 kg more than 2000 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Ranger (250 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 BMW 320. (200 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 BMW 320.
Compare all specifications:
2007 BMW 320 | 2000 Ford Ranger | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 320 | Ranger |
Year Released | 2007 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 250 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 55 L |