2007 BMW 320 vs. 2008 Jeep Commander

To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 BMW 320 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 907 kg more than 2007 BMW 320.

Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 BMW 320. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (500 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 BMW 320. (331 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 BMW 320.

Compare all specifications:

2007 BMW 320 2008 Jeep Commander
Make BMW Jeep
Model 320 Commander
Year Released 2007 2008
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 5654 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 154 HP 0 HP
Torque 331 Nm 500 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 84 mm 99.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90 mm 90.9 mm
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Top Speed 216 km/hour 208 km/hour
Acceleration 0-100mph 8.9 seconds 7.4 seconds
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1505 kg 2412 kg
Vehicle Length 4530 mm 4790 mm
Vehicle Width 1430 mm 1910 mm
Vehicle Height 1820 mm 1830 mm
Wheelbase Size 2770 mm 2790 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 6.7 L/100km 15.5 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 78 L