2007 BMW 328 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 BMW 328. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 BMW 328 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2007 BMW 328. (230 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2007 BMW 328.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 BMW 328. (271 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 BMW 328. 2013 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 2007 BMW 328 has manual transmission. 2007 BMW 328 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 BMW 328 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 328 | CTS |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2995 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 373 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 13 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |