2007 BMW 330 vs. 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept
To start off, both 2007 BMW 330 and 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept were released in the same year (2007). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,522 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept (791 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 576 more horse power than 2007 BMW 330. (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept should accelerate faster than 2007 BMW 330.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept (800 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 320 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 BMW 330. (480 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 BMW 330. 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept has automatic transmission and 2007 BMW 330 has manual transmission. 2007 BMW 330 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 BMW 330 | 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | 330 | Charger RT Concept |
Year Released | 2007 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 3522 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 791 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 480 Nm | 800 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.5 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |