2007 BMW 335 vs. 2013 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 BMW 335. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 BMW 335 would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 BMW 335 (300 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2013 Mazda CX-9. (269 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 BMW 335 should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda CX-9.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 BMW 335 (407 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda CX-9. (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2007 BMW 335 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda CX-9. 2013 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 2007 BMW 335 has manual transmission. 2007 BMW 335 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 BMW 335 | 2013 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | BMW | Mazda |
| Model | 335 | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2979 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 269 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 89.6 mm | 86 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5108 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1936 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1728 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2875 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 12.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 76 L |
