2007 BMW 523 vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 BMW 523. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 BMW 523 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 96 more horse power than 2007 BMW 523. (175 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2007 BMW 523.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 370 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 BMW 523. (230 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 BMW 523.
Compare all specifications:
2007 BMW 523 | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | 523 | XF |
Year Released | 2007 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 271 HP |
Torque | 230 Nm | 600 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.3 seconds | 5.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.5 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |