2007 BMW Alpina vs. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2007 BMW Alpina is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer would be higher. At 4,397 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 BMW Alpina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 BMW Alpina (500 HP) has 225 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. (275 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 BMW Alpina should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 272 kg more than 2007 BMW Alpina.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 BMW Alpina (700 Nm) has 327 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. (373 Nm). This means 2007 BMW Alpina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
Compare all specifications:
2007 BMW Alpina | 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | Alpina | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 2007 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4397 cc | 4162 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 275 HP |
Torque | 700 Nm | 373 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 2247 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3280 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 95 L |