2007 BMW M3 vs. 2004 Pontiac Montana

To start off, 2007 BMW M3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Pontiac Montana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Pontiac Montana would be higher. At 3,392 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Pontiac Montana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 BMW M3 (338 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 2004 Pontiac Montana. (185 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Pontiac Montana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Pontiac Montana weights approximately 355 kg more than 2007 BMW M3.

Because 2004 Pontiac Montana is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Pontiac Montana will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 BMW M3 (365 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Pontiac Montana. (298 Nm). This means 2007 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Pontiac Montana. 2004 Pontiac Montana has automatic transmission and 2007 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 2007 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Pontiac Montana will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2007 BMW M3 2004 Pontiac Montana
Make BMW Pontiac
Model M3 Montana
Year Released 2007 2004
Body Type Convertible Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3245 cc 3392 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 338 HP 185 HP
Engine RPM 7900 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 365 Nm 298 Nm
Engine Bore Size 87 mm 92 mm
Engine Stroke Size 91 mm 84 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.5:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1655 kg 2010 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 5120 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1740 mm
Wheelbase Size 2740 mm 3050 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 10.2 L/100km 9.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 12.1 L/100km 11.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 95 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]