2007 BMW X3 vs. 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2007 BMW X3 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 291 kg more than 2007 BMW X3.
Because 2007 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 BMW X3 | 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | BMW | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | X3 | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2996 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 268 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 193 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 2106 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.3 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 109 L |
