2007 BMW X3 vs. 2006 Cadillac STS-V

To start off, 2007 BMW X3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac STS-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac STS-V would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (440 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 225 more horse power than 2007 BMW X3. (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 2007 BMW X3.

Because 2007 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac STS-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (584 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 BMW X3. (480 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 BMW X3.

Compare all specifications:

2007 BMW X3 2006 Cadillac STS-V
Make BMW Cadillac
Model X3 STS-V
Year Released 2007 2006
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2993 cc 4376 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 215 HP 440 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 480 Nm 584 Nm
Torque RPM 1750 RPM 3600 RPM
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4570 mm 4990 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1860 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2960 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 8.6 L/100km 13.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 67 L 64 L