2007 BMW X3 vs. 2011 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2011 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 BMW X3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 BMW X3 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 SsangYong Chairman W is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 SsangYong Chairman W (222 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2007 BMW X3. (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 SsangYong Chairman W should accelerate faster than 2007 BMW X3.
Because 2007 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 SsangYong Chairman W. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 SsangYong Chairman W (296 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 BMW X3. (200 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2011 SsangYong Chairman W will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 BMW X3.
Compare all specifications:
2007 BMW X3 | 2011 SsangYong Chairman W | |
Make | BMW | SsangYong |
Model | X3 | Chairman W |
Year Released | 2007 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 222 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 296 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 198 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1495 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |