2007 BMW X5 vs. 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR
To start off, 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 BMW X5 would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,064 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 863 more horse power than 2007 BMW X5. (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR should accelerate faster than 2007 BMW X5.
Because 2007 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,060 Nm @ 6100 RPM) has 580 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 BMW X5. (480 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 BMW X5 | 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR | |
| Make | BMW | Koenigsegg |
| Model | X5 | CCXR |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2008 |
| Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 4719 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 1064 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Torque | 480 Nm | 1060 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 400 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.6 seconds | 2.9 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1996 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 22 L/100km |
