2007 Buick LaCrosse vs. 2009 Land Rover LR2

To start off, 2009 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Buick LaCrosse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Buick LaCrosse would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Buick LaCrosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover LR2 (227 HP) has 27 more horse power than 2007 Buick LaCrosse. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 2007 Buick LaCrosse.

Because 2009 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Buick LaCrosse. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Buick LaCrosse (312 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Land Rover LR2. (234 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2007 Buick LaCrosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Land Rover LR2.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Buick LaCrosse 2009 Land Rover LR2
Make Buick Land Rover
Model LaCrosse LR2
Year Released 2007 2009
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3791 cc 3192 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 200 HP 227 HP
Torque 312 Nm 234 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 97 mm 84 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 96 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 10.8:1
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1910 mm
Fuel Consumption 7.8 L/100km 10.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 11.8 L/100km 14.9 L/100km