2007 Cadillac BLS vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2007 Cadillac BLS is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2007 Cadillac BLS. (207 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2007 Cadillac BLS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 515 kg more than 2007 Cadillac BLS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Cadillac BLS | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
Model | BLS | 62 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 7028 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 2075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 79 L |