2007 Cadillac BLS vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2007 Cadillac BLS is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac BLS (207 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 790 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac BLS (300 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Cadillac BLS | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
| Model | BLS | 102 |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 207 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2160 mm |
