2007 Cadillac CTS vs. 1952 Skoda 1200
To start off, 2007 Cadillac CTS is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Skoda 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Skoda 1200 would be higher. At 2,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1952 Skoda 1200. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1952 Skoda 1200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac CTS (263 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Skoda 1200. (75 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Skoda 1200.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Cadillac CTS | 1952 Skoda 1200 | |
Make | Cadillac | Skoda |
Model | CTS | 1200 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2801 cc | 1221 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 263 Nm | 75 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2690 mm |