2007 Cadillac CTS vs. 1963 Lotus 25
To start off, 2007 Cadillac CTS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac CTS (253 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1963 Lotus 25. (196 HP @ 9500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1250 kg more than 1963 Lotus 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Cadillac CTS | 1963 Lotus 25 | |
Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
Model | CTS | 25 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 196 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 9500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1706 kg | 456 kg |