2007 Cadillac CTS vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2007 Cadillac CTS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1130 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac CTS (263 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Cadillac CTS | 1965 Seat 600 | |
Make | Cadillac | Seat |
Model | CTS | 600 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 767 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 263 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2010 mm |