2007 Cadillac CTS vs. 1966 Ford Taunus
To start off, 2007 Cadillac CTS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 2,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1966 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Taunus.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Cadillac CTS | 1966 Ford Taunus | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | CTS | Taunus |
Year Released | 2007 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2801 cc | 1183 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 45 L |