2007 Cadillac CTS vs. 1966 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 2007 Cadillac CTS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 2,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac CTS (210 HP) has 121 more horse power than 1966 Triumph Vitesse. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph Vitesse.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Cadillac CTS | 1966 Triumph Vitesse | |
| Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
| Model | CTS | Vitesse |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2801 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 89 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 38 L |
