2007 Cadillac CTS vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2007 Cadillac CTS is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac CTS (253 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 851 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Cadillac CTS | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
| Model | CTS | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 846 cc |
| Horse Power | 253 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1706 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2010 mm |
